"
Originally Posted by: Alli When referring to beer or wash, we are referring by definition to a liquid made from grain. Wine by definition is made from fruit. A sugar/water neutral is made from neither and they be other fermentables out there made from something other than fruit or grain.
I don't think there's a problem based on current administrative law:
27 CFR 19.1 - Definitions:Quote:Mash, wort, wash. Any fermented material capable of, or intended for, use as a distilling material.
Quote:The proposed Rule seems to say again that only the fermented beer and wine can be distilled. Obviously this would not include sugar/water mix or honeyshine.
The definitions of beer & wine include ale, lager, barley wine, cider, perry, rice wine, mead and similar. These are all legal to produce for personal or family use. Brewers use all sorts of stuff, sugar, treacle, honey, rice, corn ... and yes, even potato and pumpkin. There are also ""wines"" from things like tapioca. A pure water/sugar ""wine"" would probably be considered an ""Agricultural Wine"" ... which is where mead fits in:
27 CFR §24.200 - Production of Agricultural Wine - General.Quote:Agricultural wine may be produced on bonded wine premises from suitable agricultural products other than the juice of fruit. Water or sugar, or both, may be used within the limitations of this subpart in the production of agricultural wine.
I think the KISS philosophy is best. If you can make the ""mash, wort, wash"" legally under existing law, then it should be legal to distill for ""personal or family use"" under the proposed law. I understand the concern, but if we succeed, I think it would be unlikely for an individual suffer seizure of property and a felony conviction because he was using a sugar wash rather than AG beer or ""normal"" wine."