logo                   
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Guest  
#1 Posted : Sunday, March 04, 2007 7:08:24 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Ok, so I"m not quite done with my rum obsession yet ;,

My latest batch of double distilled rum aged very well and came out a wonderful drink.
So I figured I"ll try my hand at fractioned refluxed rum with blended cuts. Did the usual base of dark brown sugar and a couple of jars of molasses, fermented to 19% and distilled with a full 4" column packed with slightly loose copper. Collected all my cuts till 90c, yield was great, had almost a gallon of uncut after blending at about 84% and a full 6L after cutting.

Catch was that my uncut stuff had a strong sharp ammonia like smell. After cutting it was much less apparent and smelled more like the double distilled rum before it was aged ,so I"m hoping aging will solve this,.

I discussed this with a friend of mine that used to work for a rum distillery and he told me it might be a side effect of the yeast nutrients ,I used turbo48,, and that one solution would be to carbon filter 1/3 - 1/2 and remix it with the rest, yet it will compromise the final heaviness of my rum after it matures.

Elricko: I remember you tired a very similar method with your rum using rashing rings and ended up z-filtering it. Did you get any off smells pre filtering?

Thank you all for your patience with my obsessiveness! ;,
Guest  
#2 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 1:14:18 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Alex:

Yes I always run mine through a reflux still. No I don't get any ammonia smells and I always use MileHi Turbo 48. I'd be surprized if it was a yeast problem. I do get that kind of burnt nasty smell as I get to tails, but that's not unusuual. Was the smell all the way through the cuts, or just at the end? Did you make sure you had 'unsulfered' molasses?

I usually set aside half of my batch to age in wood then z-filter the other half. I like white rum ,my wife particularly likes white rum, as well as dark rum and the filtered stuff makes excellent white rum for mixing. Try it with cheery coke! The aged stuff is for sipping.

Don't worry about being obsessive, I think we all are.

Cheers
Guest  
#3 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 6:16:53 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Elricko:

Yup, I got it all the way through. At first I thought it was the methanol coming through that way with the rum, but it stayed very noticeable thought the entire process.
I used grandma"s original unsulphured molasses and there was so much copper contact that sulfur should not have been the problem. I used mostly completely fresh copper packing.
The ones that were reused were boiled in vinegar and then re-boiled in clean water. Both parts of my fractioning column were thoroughly washed and clean.
I can"t imagine where it could be coming from.

Barring that ammonia like smell, even as I reached the tails it smelled really tasty in that heavy kind of way ,I prefer sipping rum, using hand made alcohol for mixing kind of breaks my heart ;, ,. I set 5L of it to age in oak ,using the "economy" barrels from brewhaus,, and another L is being spiced in glass.

I recall that the stripping tails run of my pot stilled batch had a slightly similar smell to them and after a couple for weeks actually started smelling sweet and chocolate like.

I hear mile-hi being mentioned a lot. Is this a physical store? I couldn"t find a mention of it in reference to brewing online. The turbo48 I used was from brewhaus.


I"ll keep you posted as this batch ages.

Thanks for the help!
Guest  
#4 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 7:25:15 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

The ammonia smell could very easily be caused by remaining nutrients in the wash if copper was used in the distillation process. The nutrients in a turbo yeast are generally intended for use with sugar washes, where no natural nutrition is in place. For fermenting a product that has some natural nutrition, you really need a 'tailored' yeast mixture that adjusts for the exact nutritional component of the wash. In your specific case, I would suggest the Pot Distiller's Turbo.
Guest  
#5 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 8:07:55 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Rick:

Brilliant, thanks! I was treating the brown sugar/ molasses wash as a straight sugar wash. Had no idea they had any nutrition component.

Would I need any nutrient additive to the pot distillers yeast?
Guest  
#6 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 9:05:18 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Rick:

I just did some reading up on Pot Distillers Yeast, pretty impressive product. They mention it thrives in a high Ph environment ,3.5-5, and recommend using chalk to base the wash ,Tsp. per Kg of fruit, not sure how that will translate to molasses, might have to take readings,.

I see brewhaus sells citric acid for adding acidity and I could only find one product that pushes for a higher ph ,and it balances to a fixed 5.2 Ph which is a bit too high,.

I hope it"s not too pushy of me to ask, but can you recommend anything that can help me push my Ph higher, or maybe help point out some of the pitfalls of using chalk?

Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Guest  
#7 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 12:49:00 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

No, there is no need to add anything to the Pot Distiller's Turbo for your molasses wash.
Guest  
#8 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 12:50:46 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Sounds simple enough.

Thanks!
Guest  
#9 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 12:53:00 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

There are usually only two ways to lower the acidity in a wash. The most commonly used method is simple dilution- add water and sugar to the wash ,the former for reducing acidity, the latter for bringing the SG back up,. Some suggest the use of precipitated chalk, while others say that it, at best, makes only a marginal difference. Honestly, I would suggest dilution, as I have done this very successfully in the past.
Guest  
#10 Posted : Monday, March 05, 2007 8:21:27 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

I'll take it to heart. I use 5Gal buckets so my dilution ability is a bit limited but I'll see how far I can push it.

Is this the same product we're talking about? http://www.partyman.se/fruitmash.html
Guest  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2007 1:07:39 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Very interesting. I have been using turbo and haven't had the problem that Alex had with my rum however I will try the Pot Distillers yeast next time and see what difference it makes.
Guest  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:01:00 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Yes, this is the same product.
Guest  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2007 7:48:57 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Elricko:

Looks like I"m dealing with a group of rebellious microorganisms that are trying to keep my life interesting ;,
Which turbo yeast did you end up using for your rum?
Guest  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2007 8:30:19 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Alex:

I have always used MileHi Turbo 48. I get it at http://www.milehidistilling.com/ I don't want to advertise Rick's competition on his forum, but hey, you asked. I usually get the 4 pack for $20 and find it works pretty well with everything I make.

However I will be trying the stuff Rick recommended on the next batch just to see if there is a difference. What he says makes perfect sense, so it's worth a try. I'm always open for new ideas. If it makes a better product I will be singing it's praises in the future.

Cheers
Guest  
#15 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2007 10:06:04 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Elricko:

I was just curious as to the exact turbo yeast you were using ,they each have a bit of a different nutrient make up, so I figured if you were not getting the ammonia like smell I was, it might have been due to a different turbo being used. Having said that, it"s the same exact yeast I used.

No worries Rick, my loyalties are not so easily swayed ;,

I"m going to use the pot distillers yeast on my next batch as well, if it really will bring out more of the base flavor of the wash, it should really improve the rum"s aroma.

I"m also planning to try it on a small batch of mead. I hear it might shorten the time to get the mead "drinkable" unlike champagne or wine yeasts.

I"ll post if anything interesting comes of it.
Guest  
#16 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2007 10:12:13 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Correction, I used the Turbo 48 from bewhaus. I"m looking into the nutrient content differences.
Guest  
#17 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2007 10:32:04 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Alex,

I'm going to give this a try as well. I bought some pot distillers yeast a while back to make some brandies with, but haven't got there yet. I've used a lot of Rick's turbo 48- got the 50 pack discount, and never had any off's. Several different batches and mixtures of rums. Only one problem, was when I once tried ec1118, and after several days, and with only an occasional bubble, I added turbo 48, and had to pull the airlock off and set it into the bathtub. I once added a jar of extra mollasses to a batch, when it was slowing down, and even that wasn't as violent.

If you ever do any of the grains, try the whiskey yeast with AG. I've had some great result from that.
Guest  
#18 Posted : Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:04:09 PM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

John,

Would be really interested to hear your findings.
I'm curious to see how this yeast functions without additional Ph buffering.
Guest  
#19 Posted : Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:20:56 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

Alex,

Being a turbo, at least if its like the others, it will contain a ph buffer, just right for that particular yeast. But I will be trying it out, and will let you know the result.
Guest  
#20 Posted : Wednesday, March 07, 2007 6:02:03 AM(UTC)
Guest

Rank: Guest

Groups: Guests
Joined: 2/10/2002(UTC)
Posts: 5,254

John,

I figure that to be the case as well, it"s the article mentioned above ,http://www.partyman.se/fruitmash.html, that introduced a little doubt for me.
Users browsing this topic
Guest (3)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.