Let's get back on track...
Quote:Thanks for setting this up Rick. Hope this gets the discussion going. I think as as start one possible solutuion is just to add distillation to whatever law or rules allow home hobbiests to make beer and wine. This seems to me to be the easiest course.
Maddawgs
This seems like the simplest approach, but given that the TTB is part of the Treasury (and hence only interested in tax dollars), I wonder if it would prove to be a successful path. Do I personally feel that
hobby distillation should be any different from
hobby brewing or winemaking? No, of course not. However, if the TTB thinks that they are losing more tax dollars (they can add up faster with spirits than beer or wine- yes, I know that people will not consume as much distilled spirit as beer, but I am trying to play devil's advocate a little here), then they are going to want to recover those. There are likely two viable options, as they would see it:
1
) Stomp out hobby distilling. You and I know that using the lists obtained to go after hobbyists will only serve to drive hobby distillers more underground. They will build instead of buy (reducing income tax on those selling equipment, but that's another story), and there will be less open discussion due to fear of prosecution, all of which only results in more danger due to unsafe equipment (in cases) and lack of knowledge. But, ultimately, they will never stop hobby distilling. (And look at all of the revenue from micro-distilleries as a result of hobby distilling turned commercial- do they really
want to stop it??)
2) Recover those lost tax dollars. Creating a Hobby Distiller's License would both bring in the lost tax revenue (and likely more), and reduce the costs associated with going after the hobbyist. This is even more of a good option (for the TTB) with the TTB pulling these lists, as people would be on the list. If they do not purchase the license then the TTB knows that the person is either not distilling alcohol or distilling illegally. Just throwing out a figure- a $100 per year license would be equal to the excise tax on nearly 50 bottles (750ml) of vodka. How many hobby distillers would realistically purchase that many bottles of spirits in a year? Very few. So, the lost revenue would be more than made up. A realistic number is probably more like $50 per year (that is still roughly 24 bottles of spirits per year, or one every couple of weeks!).
While I would be a bit put off by option 2, as I stand by my opinion that hobby distilling should fall under the same rules as hobby brewing and winemaking, I think that option 2 offers something that could gain a footing with the TTB, as you give them back the revenue that they feel they are losing. If you remove that from the equation then you should remove at least a reasonable amount of resistance with it. It would still be an uphill battle, but I don't think that the slope is quite as steep as just pushing for distillation to be moved under the same rules as brewing.