Okay, I'm getting some conflicting signals here that need sorted out. Everyone on here seems to expound the virtues of carbon filtering at great length. My first run through, I was EXTREMELY careful, yet I only hit 90%, and still found it necessary to use activated charcoal to clean up the aroma after distilling.
However, in John Stone's <u>Making Gin & Vodka</u>, he states that pure alcohol produced from a fractioning column 'should not require 'cleaning up' because all the unpleasant things have been removed in the distillation process.' Of course, the fractioning column he refers to in this case is the Nixon-Stone offset-head design.
I was told by Brewhaus that their column, 'due to its height, generally comes into equilibrium extremely quickly- literally by the time that you have pulled off the first 1/4-1/2 cup', and I have no reason do doubt this, but I wonder why I still have to use activated charcoal. Either:
a, I did something incorrectly, and should be doing more to get from 90% to 96%
b, John Stone was not correct.
c, This still design combined with the 1100W boiler is inefficient for producing straight ethanol compared to the offset-head design.
As to item ,a,, this is entirely possible. It was my first run, however I went through the instructions as to the operation of the still as close to established sources as I was able. The temperature began to rise, I turned on cooling water, threw out the amount that smelled like solvent, and collected until the temperature in the stillhead began to rise, getting nearly four liters of 90% alcohol from 25 liters of sugar/water/turbo yeast wash.
As to item ,b,, I would mention that Stone makes the distinction between what he calls pure ethanol and 'moonshine'; moonshine being an alcohol purification of imperfect separation created from a similar wash. This latter contains off flavors while pure ethanol does not ,at least, according to him,. If these off flavors Greg and I are getting are due in any way to impurities in the ethenol, are we doing something wrong and falling short of the 95-96% level or ,c,, is the Pro Series II somehow less efficient than a valved reflux design?
If ,c, is the case, I could certainly understand some sacrifices being made for the sake of speed of distillation, the slack of which to be taken up later by activated charcoal, but if so this is something I would have liked to have known before purchasing my still, and it may have made the difference between my immediate purchase of this design and a request for more information or perhaps even customization.
All of this being said, there seem to be some indications that something new is coming from Brewhaus in the near future. If this is a valved design, I would gladly, GLADLY buy it from them. Do you guys have a trade-in program?